Gilat Satellite Networks has announced it has been selected by its long-time customer and Kazakhstan’s largest telecommunications operator, JSC Kazakhtelecom (KT), to expand its existing SkyEdge network to serve several hundred additional sites in remote locations nationwide.
In addition to providing network connectivity for businesses and consumers, the new expansion will be used to provide telephony and broadband Internet services to remote communities in Kazakhstan as part of a Universal Service Obligation (USO).
Gilat’s SkyEdge VSATs are ideally suited for USO requirements, with toll-quality telephony, low-power options and very high MTBF. SkyEdge enables the delivery of advanced enterprise data networking and telephony services.
“Gilat’s ability to anticipate and meet our requirements is the foundation of our successful, long-term business relationship. Gilat’s SkyEdge network, based on advanced VSAT technology and experience, enables us to continue to provide the highest level of customer service while meeting the complex networking requirements of Kazakhstan’s enterprises, government agencies and consumers,” said KT Chief Technical Director Lezgovko Aleksandr Vladimirovich.
Arie Rozichner, Gilat’s regional vice president, Eurasia, said, “We are proud to continue to support the growing needs of KT, a Gilat customer since 1998. Gilat’s VSAT technology provides an excellent solution for KT, enabling the delivery of cost-effective, high-speed Internet and telephony services to citizens amid Kazakhstan’s harsh terrain and severe weather conditions. We look forward to continuing our market leadership in Kazakhstan and helping KT improve the quality of life for citizens in the most remote regions of the country.”
Gilat’s SkyEdge is a satellite communications system that delivers high-quality voice, broadband data and video services over a powerful unified system. SkyEdge represents Gilat’s extensive knowledge base and field-proven product offering, acquired through two decades of experience. SkyEdge’s flexible architecture and efficient space segment utilization make it an ideal platform for operators and service providers.
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Gilat SkyEdge II broadband satellite network to serve West Africa’s corporate sector
Gilat Satellite Networks announced that it has been chosen by Netcom Africa Limited to provide a SkyEdge II network that will serve West Africa’s corporate, energy and financial sectors. Based in Nigeria, Netcom is a leading communication infrastructure provider for satellite and wireless broadband solutions.
Netcom chose Gilat’s SkyEdge II network to provide VoIP and high-speed data networking services. Gilat’s SkyEdge II is well-suited to meet the requirements of the corporate and banking industry while providing secure connectivity. Other benefits include the delivery of voice quality telephony, advanced Quality of Service (QoS) to prioritize application data traffic, and unified networks for multiple bank branches.
“We determined that Gilat’s SkyEdge II provides the highest space segment savings, while at the same time enabling us to provide a high-performance, reliable solution to our customers,” said Yen Choi, Netcom’s Group Executive Vice President and CTO. “Gilat’s ability to anticipate and meet our requirements is the foundation of what we expect will be a successful, long-term business relationship.”
Nir Korman, Gilat’s Regional Vice President, Africa, said, “We are pleased to have been chosen by Netcom to provide a SkyEdge II broadband satellite network. SkyEdge II is an excellent solution for the corporate and banking sectors, fully meeting their strict requirements. ”
SkyEdge II is a standards-based system using DVB-S2 and DVB-RCS. With better efficiencies and full adaptivity for both the inbound and outbound channels, it provides higher performance that serves the growing requirements of end-users. SkyEdge II enables the delivery of high-quality voice, broadband data and video services for diverse environments including enterprises, rural networks, cellular backhaul and government network applications.
Netcom chose Gilat’s SkyEdge II network to provide VoIP and high-speed data networking services. Gilat’s SkyEdge II is well-suited to meet the requirements of the corporate and banking industry while providing secure connectivity. Other benefits include the delivery of voice quality telephony, advanced Quality of Service (QoS) to prioritize application data traffic, and unified networks for multiple bank branches.
“We determined that Gilat’s SkyEdge II provides the highest space segment savings, while at the same time enabling us to provide a high-performance, reliable solution to our customers,” said Yen Choi, Netcom’s Group Executive Vice President and CTO. “Gilat’s ability to anticipate and meet our requirements is the foundation of what we expect will be a successful, long-term business relationship.”
Nir Korman, Gilat’s Regional Vice President, Africa, said, “We are pleased to have been chosen by Netcom to provide a SkyEdge II broadband satellite network. SkyEdge II is an excellent solution for the corporate and banking sectors, fully meeting their strict requirements. ”
SkyEdge II is a standards-based system using DVB-S2 and DVB-RCS. With better efficiencies and full adaptivity for both the inbound and outbound channels, it provides higher performance that serves the growing requirements of end-users. SkyEdge II enables the delivery of high-quality voice, broadband data and video services for diverse environments including enterprises, rural networks, cellular backhaul and government network applications.
Spacenet Rural Communications: Gilat’s SkyEdge II will bring high-performance broadband satellite network to Peru
Archive for the 'Gilat Satellite Networks' Category
Mar 27, 2009, post by JakubKuchnio
Spacenet Rural Communications: Gilat’s SkyEdge II will bring high-performance broadband satellite network to Peru
Gilat Satellite Networks announced that its business unit, Spacenet Rural Communications, is deploying a SkyEdge II network to cover hundreds of sites in Peru. The new network is being used to serve Peru’s national bank, Banco de la Nación, a long time customer of Gilat, as well as other private businesses.
With the migration to the new network, which includes a SkyEdge II hub and hundreds of SkyEdge II IP VSATs, Peru’s Banco de la Nación as well as other enterprise customers, will benefit from enhanced voice and data networking services. This includes high-speed connectivity to allow high throughput for file transfer, transactional service applications such as ATMs and voice quality IP telephony. The new network provides Banco de la Nación with a high availability solution including VSAT redundancy, in addition to providing excellent Quality of Service (QoS) for mission-critical applications.
“SkyEdge II provides us the competitive advantage we need to best serve the complex requirements of our customers,” said Arieh Rohrstock, General Manager, Spacenet Rural Peru. “We are already benefiting from the platform’s high efficiency which is contributing to space segment savings. With increasing space segment prices and lack of available capacity, we intend to upgrade hundreds of more internet and data sites to the SkyEdge II platform, allowing us to continue growing with internet services while reducing bandwidth consumption.”
SkyEdge II is a standards-based system using DVB-S2 and DVB-RCS. With better efficiencies and full adaptivity for both the inbound and outbound channels, it provides higher performance that serves the growing requirements of end-users. SkyEdge II enables the delivery of high-quality voice, broadband data and video services for diverse environments including enterprises, rural networks, cellular backhaul and government network applications.
SkyEdge II adds new capabilities to Gilat’s industry-leading SkyEdge family of VSAT products. Gilat’s SkyEdge portfolio enables the delivery of high-quality voice, broadband data and video services. SkyEdge represents Gilat’s extensive knowledge base and field-proven product offering, acquired through two decades of experience. SkyEdge’s flexible architecture and efficient space segment utilization make it an ideal platform for operators and service providers. With Gilat’s comprehensive SkyEdge portfolio, service providers can choose the most suitable product for their application needs.
Mar 27, 2009, post by JakubKuchnio
Spacenet Rural Communications: Gilat’s SkyEdge II will bring high-performance broadband satellite network to Peru
Gilat Satellite Networks announced that its business unit, Spacenet Rural Communications, is deploying a SkyEdge II network to cover hundreds of sites in Peru. The new network is being used to serve Peru’s national bank, Banco de la Nación, a long time customer of Gilat, as well as other private businesses.
With the migration to the new network, which includes a SkyEdge II hub and hundreds of SkyEdge II IP VSATs, Peru’s Banco de la Nación as well as other enterprise customers, will benefit from enhanced voice and data networking services. This includes high-speed connectivity to allow high throughput for file transfer, transactional service applications such as ATMs and voice quality IP telephony. The new network provides Banco de la Nación with a high availability solution including VSAT redundancy, in addition to providing excellent Quality of Service (QoS) for mission-critical applications.
“SkyEdge II provides us the competitive advantage we need to best serve the complex requirements of our customers,” said Arieh Rohrstock, General Manager, Spacenet Rural Peru. “We are already benefiting from the platform’s high efficiency which is contributing to space segment savings. With increasing space segment prices and lack of available capacity, we intend to upgrade hundreds of more internet and data sites to the SkyEdge II platform, allowing us to continue growing with internet services while reducing bandwidth consumption.”
SkyEdge II is a standards-based system using DVB-S2 and DVB-RCS. With better efficiencies and full adaptivity for both the inbound and outbound channels, it provides higher performance that serves the growing requirements of end-users. SkyEdge II enables the delivery of high-quality voice, broadband data and video services for diverse environments including enterprises, rural networks, cellular backhaul and government network applications.
SkyEdge II adds new capabilities to Gilat’s industry-leading SkyEdge family of VSAT products. Gilat’s SkyEdge portfolio enables the delivery of high-quality voice, broadband data and video services. SkyEdge represents Gilat’s extensive knowledge base and field-proven product offering, acquired through two decades of experience. SkyEdge’s flexible architecture and efficient space segment utilization make it an ideal platform for operators and service providers. With Gilat’s comprehensive SkyEdge portfolio, service providers can choose the most suitable product for their application needs.
Friday, March 27, 2009
SATLYNX awarded € 6.7M contract from Polish NATO forces and enters Offset Agreement with Poland
Blue Oceans Satellite Systems Inc. announced its newest application for asset tracking and remote monitoring with the addition of its Explosives Regulatory Division (ERD)-Compliant Satellite-Based Explosive Magazine Monitoring Solution (EMMS). The solution, based on the system requirements of the federal government of Canada’s Explosives Magazine Security Surveillance Program, represents the latest step in the company’s remote monitoring capabilities. The EMMS utilizes the Iridium satellite network – the largest commercial satellite constellation in the world, delivering global coverage to offer the only certified two-way access control to remote explosive magazines.
Employing the bi-directional Iridium data service allows Blue Oceans’ customers to implement on-demand remote queries of systems and immediate over-the-air system updates, such as the acces entry changes. It also allows for the remote diagnosis of problems, which virtually eliminates the need to dispatch service personnel. Additionally, the base product is easily expandable, allowing two explosive magazines to be monitored from one unit. Customers find these cost-effective benefits particularly valuable.
Blue Oceans is cooperating with Value-Added Resellers (VARs) across Canada to offer customers local installation and purchasing entities. This alliance will allow local distribution and superior installation, maintenance and monitoring services to customers everywhere in Canada.
Read comments (0)
Mar 19, 2009, post by Artur Ślesik
Roskosmos to select new rocket for PPTS
One of the challenges Russian designers faced in developing the next-generation spacecraft in the first decade of the 21st century was the need for a new rocket to launch it. Since the future ship replacing Soyuz would have to carry six instead three crewmembers and weigh from 12 to 23 tons, it would need much larger launch vehicle than existing Soyuz rocket capable of carrying just seven tons to the low-Earth orbit. Developers had few options to consider among existing rockets:
Although several ways of upgrading the Soyuz rocket had been evaluated in the middle of decade within Soyuz-2-3 and Soyuz-3 programs, Russian space agency ultimately came to realize that the overall architecture of the Soyuz rocket was too obsolete for the new tasks of the 21st century;
Any idea of using the existing Proton rocket, which did have required lifting capacity, would be out of the question, since the vehicle used toxic propellants and the agency’s policy was to phase out the rocket, as soon as the replacement Angara family becomes available;
The Proton replacement — the Angara rocket — had been in development since the beginning of the 1990s and with considerable investments already committed to the project, it was expected to fly its first mission in 2011. However the vehicle was primarily intended for delivering military and commercial satellites from its newly built launch pad in Plesetsk. Giving the role of the manned launcher to Angara would essentially leave the entire Russian rocket fleet in the hands of a single contractor — Khrunichev enterprise, clearly to be avoided “all eggs in one basket” strategy. In the meantime, existing “alternative” developer of the Soyuz rocket — TsSKB Progress in Samara — could be out of the job.
The Zenit rocket could carry a minimal mass considered for the next-generation spacecraft and it also provided a newer design than that of Soyuz and Proton. It could potentially upgraded for higher payloads. However, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the production of the vehicle ended up outside Russia, in Ukraine, making it politically unacceptable for nation’s goal of maintaining independent access to space. Organizing production of the Zenit in Russia could be considered, however it would require sizable investments, perhaps approaching the potential cost of the development of the whole new rocket. In the meantime, the vehicle itself would provide only marginal capability for lunar missions.
Development of the whole new family of rockets
Around 2008, the development of the whole new family of rockets for manned spaceflight had become attractive to the Russian government, especially in light of a decision in the previous year to build a new Vostochny launch site.
A strategic decision to place the space center in the Russian Far East brought up the issue of transporting the vehicles to the region from the industrial centers in western Russia. The size of rocket stages would either have to be limited by the capabilities of railway transport, or the Russian government would have to commit to the development of a compatible air transportation system. Finally, the third alternative would be the development of a whole new manufacturing base right there in the Far East. Despite being probably the most expensive and economically difficult proposition, it would match the political goal of the Russian government to industrialize this isolated and sparsely populated region.
Choosing the developer
Upon committing to the development of the new vehicle, Russian space agency had to decide about the design of the future rocket and choose its manufacturer. During 2008, all major rocket “firms” competed with their configurations for the role of building a future manned launcher. In the third quarter of 2008, the “system evaluation” of possible architecture of the future vehicle was completed and several proposals for the rocket were apparently submitted to Roskosmos by Sept. 1, 2008.
Although Roskosmos made no formal announcement on the matter at the time, unofficial postings on the forum of the Novosti Kosmonavtiki magazine indicated that the agency favored a two-stage launch vehicle developed by the conglomerate of RKK Energia in Podlipki, TsSKB Progress in Samara and KB Mashinostroeniya in Miass. TsSKB Progress would have bear overall responsibility for the launch vehicle and its second stage. KB Mashinostroeniya would develop the first stage. Finally, RKK Energia was expected to have over responsibility for the manned transport system. Thus, all key players in the industry would retain their traditional responsibilities and preserve their workforce.
Design requirements
The first stage of the medium-lifting rocket favored by Roskosmos would apparently consist of three standard boosters equipped with RD-180 engines. Its unmanned version would have to deliver 23.8 tons to the 200-kilometer orbit with the inclination 51.7 degrees after the launch from Vostochny. The man-rated version would have to be capable of delivering a 18.8-ton spacecraft to a minimum 135 by 440-kilometer orbit, from which its descent module would be able to conduct an emergency reentry and landing just north of the launch site, while subjecting the crew to no more than 12 g. In case of a single-engine failure on the first stage, the rocket was required to make a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean, using the thrust of two remaining engines.
In an interview with BBC, Aleksandr Chulkov, the head of launch vehicle and infrastructure directorate, confirmed that the launch vehicle would have to be able to carry at least 20 tons and maximum 23 tons to the low-Earth orbit. Within Russian nomenclature, the new rocket would be classified as a medium-lifting vehicle, while heavy-lifting vehicles would be capable of delivering from 35 to 50 tons to the low-Earth orbit. Chulkov said that requirements for heavy-lifting capabilities within the manned space program would be met by the Angara family of rockets. Still, the new rocket equipped with five standard boosters on the first stage instead of three would be able to deliver 35 tons to the low-Earth orbit, while another variation, including four standard boosters on the first stage and one on the second stage, could carry 50 tons.
Since the Technical Assignment for the program reportedly required the construction of as many as 15 launchers, it could require the production of as many as 45 engines a year. With the moderate rate of four launches a year, 12 engines would be required annually. Due to such high numbers of required engines and the need to produce same hardware for the American Atlas rocket, it looked possible that an additional manufacturer based in the city of Perm would be brought into the project. The same company was responsible for mass production of RD-191 engine for the Angara rocket.
The second stage of the vehicle had to be powered either by kerosene or hydrogen according to the Technical Assignment of the Russian space agency. The head of the Russian space agency, Roskosmos, Anatoly Perminov told Russian press that hydrogen would be used on the second stage.
According to unofficial reports, a formal opening of envelopes with industry proposals on the new rocket would take place on March 16, 2009. The commission was then expected to make a decision on March 19. Chulkov said that Roskosmos would have 10 days to complete the formal review of all proposals and the agency would pick a winner by March 25, 2009. The key consideration would be cost-effectiveness of the proposal, Chulkov said. The decision would be followed by the preliminary development of the project, which was expected to last for around one year.
more > russianspaceweb.com
Read comments (0)
Mar 11, 2009, post by Artur Ślesik
SATLYNX awarded € 6.7M contract from Polish NATO forces and enters Offset Agreement with Poland
Satlynx, a GE company and a leading provider of satellite telecommunications, announced today a €6.7M business agreement with the Polish Government via its military systems partner WZL (Wojskowe Zakłady Łączności Nr 1) to provide a range of satellite equipment. In addition, Satlynx and GE have entered an Offset Agreement with the Polish Ministry of Economic Affairs as a commitment to invest in Polish business, goods and services to a value of €17M over the next five years.
Satlynx and WZL have been cooperating on a number of different initiatives for some years and this recent contract for satellite antenna equipment and services is a significant milestone in their relationship. Christian Stetter, Vice President Sales for Satlynx said: “I am delighted that we are able to take another step together as this not only strengthens our friendship but shows a growing confidence in our partnership.”
The Offset Agreement details a series of investments from both Satlynx and other GE businesses designed to bring technology, know-how and growth to the Polish economy. Ronny Svang, President & CEO for Satlynx commented: “Satlynx has received strong support from its partner in Poland in the conclusion of this agreement which will be a catalyst to accelerate business opportunities for Satlynx and GE.”
Leslaw Kuzaj, GE’s National Executive for Poland said: “The agreement focuses on strategic areas such as technology transfer, purchase of equipment for the satellite and oil & gas industries as well as providing projects from investment in modernisation. With our industrial business units, we intend to work closely with the Polish government to maximise the benefits to the Polish economy well beyond the lifetime of the offset agreement.”
more > satlynx.com
Employing the bi-directional Iridium data service allows Blue Oceans’ customers to implement on-demand remote queries of systems and immediate over-the-air system updates, such as the acces entry changes. It also allows for the remote diagnosis of problems, which virtually eliminates the need to dispatch service personnel. Additionally, the base product is easily expandable, allowing two explosive magazines to be monitored from one unit. Customers find these cost-effective benefits particularly valuable.
Blue Oceans is cooperating with Value-Added Resellers (VARs) across Canada to offer customers local installation and purchasing entities. This alliance will allow local distribution and superior installation, maintenance and monitoring services to customers everywhere in Canada.
Read comments (0)
Mar 19, 2009, post by Artur Ślesik
Roskosmos to select new rocket for PPTS
One of the challenges Russian designers faced in developing the next-generation spacecraft in the first decade of the 21st century was the need for a new rocket to launch it. Since the future ship replacing Soyuz would have to carry six instead three crewmembers and weigh from 12 to 23 tons, it would need much larger launch vehicle than existing Soyuz rocket capable of carrying just seven tons to the low-Earth orbit. Developers had few options to consider among existing rockets:
Although several ways of upgrading the Soyuz rocket had been evaluated in the middle of decade within Soyuz-2-3 and Soyuz-3 programs, Russian space agency ultimately came to realize that the overall architecture of the Soyuz rocket was too obsolete for the new tasks of the 21st century;
Any idea of using the existing Proton rocket, which did have required lifting capacity, would be out of the question, since the vehicle used toxic propellants and the agency’s policy was to phase out the rocket, as soon as the replacement Angara family becomes available;
The Proton replacement — the Angara rocket — had been in development since the beginning of the 1990s and with considerable investments already committed to the project, it was expected to fly its first mission in 2011. However the vehicle was primarily intended for delivering military and commercial satellites from its newly built launch pad in Plesetsk. Giving the role of the manned launcher to Angara would essentially leave the entire Russian rocket fleet in the hands of a single contractor — Khrunichev enterprise, clearly to be avoided “all eggs in one basket” strategy. In the meantime, existing “alternative” developer of the Soyuz rocket — TsSKB Progress in Samara — could be out of the job.
The Zenit rocket could carry a minimal mass considered for the next-generation spacecraft and it also provided a newer design than that of Soyuz and Proton. It could potentially upgraded for higher payloads. However, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the production of the vehicle ended up outside Russia, in Ukraine, making it politically unacceptable for nation’s goal of maintaining independent access to space. Organizing production of the Zenit in Russia could be considered, however it would require sizable investments, perhaps approaching the potential cost of the development of the whole new rocket. In the meantime, the vehicle itself would provide only marginal capability for lunar missions.
Development of the whole new family of rockets
Around 2008, the development of the whole new family of rockets for manned spaceflight had become attractive to the Russian government, especially in light of a decision in the previous year to build a new Vostochny launch site.
A strategic decision to place the space center in the Russian Far East brought up the issue of transporting the vehicles to the region from the industrial centers in western Russia. The size of rocket stages would either have to be limited by the capabilities of railway transport, or the Russian government would have to commit to the development of a compatible air transportation system. Finally, the third alternative would be the development of a whole new manufacturing base right there in the Far East. Despite being probably the most expensive and economically difficult proposition, it would match the political goal of the Russian government to industrialize this isolated and sparsely populated region.
Choosing the developer
Upon committing to the development of the new vehicle, Russian space agency had to decide about the design of the future rocket and choose its manufacturer. During 2008, all major rocket “firms” competed with their configurations for the role of building a future manned launcher. In the third quarter of 2008, the “system evaluation” of possible architecture of the future vehicle was completed and several proposals for the rocket were apparently submitted to Roskosmos by Sept. 1, 2008.
Although Roskosmos made no formal announcement on the matter at the time, unofficial postings on the forum of the Novosti Kosmonavtiki magazine indicated that the agency favored a two-stage launch vehicle developed by the conglomerate of RKK Energia in Podlipki, TsSKB Progress in Samara and KB Mashinostroeniya in Miass. TsSKB Progress would have bear overall responsibility for the launch vehicle and its second stage. KB Mashinostroeniya would develop the first stage. Finally, RKK Energia was expected to have over responsibility for the manned transport system. Thus, all key players in the industry would retain their traditional responsibilities and preserve their workforce.
Design requirements
The first stage of the medium-lifting rocket favored by Roskosmos would apparently consist of three standard boosters equipped with RD-180 engines. Its unmanned version would have to deliver 23.8 tons to the 200-kilometer orbit with the inclination 51.7 degrees after the launch from Vostochny. The man-rated version would have to be capable of delivering a 18.8-ton spacecraft to a minimum 135 by 440-kilometer orbit, from which its descent module would be able to conduct an emergency reentry and landing just north of the launch site, while subjecting the crew to no more than 12 g. In case of a single-engine failure on the first stage, the rocket was required to make a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean, using the thrust of two remaining engines.
In an interview with BBC, Aleksandr Chulkov, the head of launch vehicle and infrastructure directorate, confirmed that the launch vehicle would have to be able to carry at least 20 tons and maximum 23 tons to the low-Earth orbit. Within Russian nomenclature, the new rocket would be classified as a medium-lifting vehicle, while heavy-lifting vehicles would be capable of delivering from 35 to 50 tons to the low-Earth orbit. Chulkov said that requirements for heavy-lifting capabilities within the manned space program would be met by the Angara family of rockets. Still, the new rocket equipped with five standard boosters on the first stage instead of three would be able to deliver 35 tons to the low-Earth orbit, while another variation, including four standard boosters on the first stage and one on the second stage, could carry 50 tons.
Since the Technical Assignment for the program reportedly required the construction of as many as 15 launchers, it could require the production of as many as 45 engines a year. With the moderate rate of four launches a year, 12 engines would be required annually. Due to such high numbers of required engines and the need to produce same hardware for the American Atlas rocket, it looked possible that an additional manufacturer based in the city of Perm would be brought into the project. The same company was responsible for mass production of RD-191 engine for the Angara rocket.
The second stage of the vehicle had to be powered either by kerosene or hydrogen according to the Technical Assignment of the Russian space agency. The head of the Russian space agency, Roskosmos, Anatoly Perminov told Russian press that hydrogen would be used on the second stage.
According to unofficial reports, a formal opening of envelopes with industry proposals on the new rocket would take place on March 16, 2009. The commission was then expected to make a decision on March 19. Chulkov said that Roskosmos would have 10 days to complete the formal review of all proposals and the agency would pick a winner by March 25, 2009. The key consideration would be cost-effectiveness of the proposal, Chulkov said. The decision would be followed by the preliminary development of the project, which was expected to last for around one year.
more > russianspaceweb.com
Read comments (0)
Mar 11, 2009, post by Artur Ślesik
SATLYNX awarded € 6.7M contract from Polish NATO forces and enters Offset Agreement with Poland
Satlynx, a GE company and a leading provider of satellite telecommunications, announced today a €6.7M business agreement with the Polish Government via its military systems partner WZL (Wojskowe Zakłady Łączności Nr 1) to provide a range of satellite equipment. In addition, Satlynx and GE have entered an Offset Agreement with the Polish Ministry of Economic Affairs as a commitment to invest in Polish business, goods and services to a value of €17M over the next five years.
Satlynx and WZL have been cooperating on a number of different initiatives for some years and this recent contract for satellite antenna equipment and services is a significant milestone in their relationship. Christian Stetter, Vice President Sales for Satlynx said: “I am delighted that we are able to take another step together as this not only strengthens our friendship but shows a growing confidence in our partnership.”
The Offset Agreement details a series of investments from both Satlynx and other GE businesses designed to bring technology, know-how and growth to the Polish economy. Ronny Svang, President & CEO for Satlynx commented: “Satlynx has received strong support from its partner in Poland in the conclusion of this agreement which will be a catalyst to accelerate business opportunities for Satlynx and GE.”
Leslaw Kuzaj, GE’s National Executive for Poland said: “The agreement focuses on strategic areas such as technology transfer, purchase of equipment for the satellite and oil & gas industries as well as providing projects from investment in modernisation. With our industrial business units, we intend to work closely with the Polish government to maximise the benefits to the Polish economy well beyond the lifetime of the offset agreement.”
more > satlynx.com
Roskosmos to select new rocket for PPTS
One of the challenges Russian designers faced in developing the next-generation spacecraft in the first decade of the 21st century was the need for a new rocket to launch it. Since the future ship replacing Soyuz would have to carry six instead three crewmembers and weigh from 12 to 23 tons, it would need much larger launch vehicle than existing Soyuz rocket capable of carrying just seven tons to the low-Earth orbit. Developers had few options to consider among existing rockets:
Although several ways of upgrading the Soyuz rocket had been evaluated in the middle of decade within Soyuz-2-3 and Soyuz-3 programs, Russian space agency ultimately came to realize that the overall architecture of the Soyuz rocket was too obsolete for the new tasks of the 21st century;
Any idea of using the existing Proton rocket, which did have required lifting capacity, would be out of the question, since the vehicle used toxic propellants and the agency’s policy was to phase out the rocket, as soon as the replacement Angara family becomes available;
The Proton replacement — the Angara rocket — had been in development since the beginning of the 1990s and with considerable investments already committed to the project, it was expected to fly its first mission in 2011. However the vehicle was primarily intended for delivering military and commercial satellites from its newly built launch pad in Plesetsk. Giving the role of the manned launcher to Angara would essentially leave the entire Russian rocket fleet in the hands of a single contractor — Khrunichev enterprise, clearly to be avoided “all eggs in one basket” strategy. In the meantime, existing “alternative” developer of the Soyuz rocket — TsSKB Progress in Samara — could be out of the job.
The Zenit rocket could carry a minimal mass considered for the next-generation spacecraft and it also provided a newer design than that of Soyuz and Proton. It could potentially upgraded for higher payloads. However, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the production of the vehicle ended up outside Russia, in Ukraine, making it politically unacceptable for nation’s goal of maintaining independent access to space. Organizing production of the Zenit in Russia could be considered, however it would require sizable investments, perhaps approaching the potential cost of the development of the whole new rocket. In the meantime, the vehicle itself would provide only marginal capability for lunar missions.
Development of the whole new family of rockets
Around 2008, the development of the whole new family of rockets for manned spaceflight had become attractive to the Russian government, especially in light of a decision in the previous year to build a new Vostochny launch site.
A strategic decision to place the space center in the Russian Far East brought up the issue of transporting the vehicles to the region from the industrial centers in western Russia. The size of rocket stages would either have to be limited by the capabilities of railway transport, or the Russian government would have to commit to the development of a compatible air transportation system. Finally, the third alternative would be the development of a whole new manufacturing base right there in the Far East. Despite being probably the most expensive and economically difficult proposition, it would match the political goal of the Russian government to industrialize this isolated and sparsely populated region.
Choosing the developer
Upon committing to the development of the new vehicle, Russian space agency had to decide about the design of the future rocket and choose its manufacturer. During 2008, all major rocket “firms” competed with their configurations for the role of building a future manned launcher. In the third quarter of 2008, the “system evaluation” of possible architecture of the future vehicle was completed and several proposals for the rocket were apparently submitted to Roskosmos by Sept. 1, 2008.
Although Roskosmos made no formal announcement on the matter at the time, unofficial postings on the forum of the Novosti Kosmonavtiki magazine indicated that the agency favored a two-stage launch vehicle developed by the conglomerate of RKK Energia in Podlipki, TsSKB Progress in Samara and KB Mashinostroeniya in Miass. TsSKB Progress would have bear overall responsibility for the launch vehicle and its second stage. KB Mashinostroeniya would develop the first stage. Finally, RKK Energia was expected to have over responsibility for the manned transport system. Thus, all key players in the industry would retain their traditional responsibilities and preserve their workforce.
Design requirements
The first stage of the medium-lifting rocket favored by Roskosmos would apparently consist of three standard boosters equipped with RD-180 engines. Its unmanned version would have to deliver 23.8 tons to the 200-kilometer orbit with the inclination 51.7 degrees after the launch from Vostochny. The man-rated version would have to be capable of delivering a 18.8-ton spacecraft to a minimum 135 by 440-kilometer orbit, from which its descent module would be able to conduct an emergency reentry and landing just north of the launch site, while subjecting the crew to no more than 12 g. In case of a single-engine failure on the first stage, the rocket was required to make a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean, using the thrust of two remaining engines.
In an interview with BBC, Aleksandr Chulkov, the head of launch vehicle and infrastructure directorate, confirmed that the launch vehicle would have to be able to carry at least 20 tons and maximum 23 tons to the low-Earth orbit. Within Russian nomenclature, the new rocket would be classified as a medium-lifting vehicle, while heavy-lifting vehicles would be capable of delivering from 35 to 50 tons to the low-Earth orbit. Chulkov said that requirements for heavy-lifting capabilities within the manned space program would be met by the Angara family of rockets. Still, the new rocket equipped with five standard boosters on the first stage instead of three would be able to deliver 35 tons to the low-Earth orbit, while another variation, including four standard boosters on the first stage and one on the second stage, could carry 50 tons.
Since the Technical Assignment for the program reportedly required the construction of as many as 15 launchers, it could require the production of as many as 45 engines a year. With the moderate rate of four launches a year, 12 engines would be required annually. Due to such high numbers of required engines and the need to produce same hardware for the American Atlas rocket, it looked possible that an additional manufacturer based in the city of Perm would be brought into the project. The same company was responsible for mass production of RD-191 engine for the Angara rocket.
The second stage of the vehicle had to be powered either by kerosene or hydrogen according to the Technical Assignment of the Russian space agency. The head of the Russian space agency, Roskosmos, Anatoly Perminov told Russian press that hydrogen would be used on the second stage.
According to unofficial reports, a formal opening of envelopes with industry proposals on the new rocket would take place on March 16, 2009. The commission was then expected to make a decision on March 19. Chulkov said that Roskosmos would have 10 days to complete the formal review of all proposals and the agency would pick a winner by March 25, 2009. The key consideration would be cost-effectiveness of the proposal, Chulkov said. The decision would be followed by the preliminary development of the project, which was expected to last for around one year.
more > russianspaceweb.com
Although several ways of upgrading the Soyuz rocket had been evaluated in the middle of decade within Soyuz-2-3 and Soyuz-3 programs, Russian space agency ultimately came to realize that the overall architecture of the Soyuz rocket was too obsolete for the new tasks of the 21st century;
Any idea of using the existing Proton rocket, which did have required lifting capacity, would be out of the question, since the vehicle used toxic propellants and the agency’s policy was to phase out the rocket, as soon as the replacement Angara family becomes available;
The Proton replacement — the Angara rocket — had been in development since the beginning of the 1990s and with considerable investments already committed to the project, it was expected to fly its first mission in 2011. However the vehicle was primarily intended for delivering military and commercial satellites from its newly built launch pad in Plesetsk. Giving the role of the manned launcher to Angara would essentially leave the entire Russian rocket fleet in the hands of a single contractor — Khrunichev enterprise, clearly to be avoided “all eggs in one basket” strategy. In the meantime, existing “alternative” developer of the Soyuz rocket — TsSKB Progress in Samara — could be out of the job.
The Zenit rocket could carry a minimal mass considered for the next-generation spacecraft and it also provided a newer design than that of Soyuz and Proton. It could potentially upgraded for higher payloads. However, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the production of the vehicle ended up outside Russia, in Ukraine, making it politically unacceptable for nation’s goal of maintaining independent access to space. Organizing production of the Zenit in Russia could be considered, however it would require sizable investments, perhaps approaching the potential cost of the development of the whole new rocket. In the meantime, the vehicle itself would provide only marginal capability for lunar missions.
Development of the whole new family of rockets
Around 2008, the development of the whole new family of rockets for manned spaceflight had become attractive to the Russian government, especially in light of a decision in the previous year to build a new Vostochny launch site.
A strategic decision to place the space center in the Russian Far East brought up the issue of transporting the vehicles to the region from the industrial centers in western Russia. The size of rocket stages would either have to be limited by the capabilities of railway transport, or the Russian government would have to commit to the development of a compatible air transportation system. Finally, the third alternative would be the development of a whole new manufacturing base right there in the Far East. Despite being probably the most expensive and economically difficult proposition, it would match the political goal of the Russian government to industrialize this isolated and sparsely populated region.
Choosing the developer
Upon committing to the development of the new vehicle, Russian space agency had to decide about the design of the future rocket and choose its manufacturer. During 2008, all major rocket “firms” competed with their configurations for the role of building a future manned launcher. In the third quarter of 2008, the “system evaluation” of possible architecture of the future vehicle was completed and several proposals for the rocket were apparently submitted to Roskosmos by Sept. 1, 2008.
Although Roskosmos made no formal announcement on the matter at the time, unofficial postings on the forum of the Novosti Kosmonavtiki magazine indicated that the agency favored a two-stage launch vehicle developed by the conglomerate of RKK Energia in Podlipki, TsSKB Progress in Samara and KB Mashinostroeniya in Miass. TsSKB Progress would have bear overall responsibility for the launch vehicle and its second stage. KB Mashinostroeniya would develop the first stage. Finally, RKK Energia was expected to have over responsibility for the manned transport system. Thus, all key players in the industry would retain their traditional responsibilities and preserve their workforce.
Design requirements
The first stage of the medium-lifting rocket favored by Roskosmos would apparently consist of three standard boosters equipped with RD-180 engines. Its unmanned version would have to deliver 23.8 tons to the 200-kilometer orbit with the inclination 51.7 degrees after the launch from Vostochny. The man-rated version would have to be capable of delivering a 18.8-ton spacecraft to a minimum 135 by 440-kilometer orbit, from which its descent module would be able to conduct an emergency reentry and landing just north of the launch site, while subjecting the crew to no more than 12 g. In case of a single-engine failure on the first stage, the rocket was required to make a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean, using the thrust of two remaining engines.
In an interview with BBC, Aleksandr Chulkov, the head of launch vehicle and infrastructure directorate, confirmed that the launch vehicle would have to be able to carry at least 20 tons and maximum 23 tons to the low-Earth orbit. Within Russian nomenclature, the new rocket would be classified as a medium-lifting vehicle, while heavy-lifting vehicles would be capable of delivering from 35 to 50 tons to the low-Earth orbit. Chulkov said that requirements for heavy-lifting capabilities within the manned space program would be met by the Angara family of rockets. Still, the new rocket equipped with five standard boosters on the first stage instead of three would be able to deliver 35 tons to the low-Earth orbit, while another variation, including four standard boosters on the first stage and one on the second stage, could carry 50 tons.
Since the Technical Assignment for the program reportedly required the construction of as many as 15 launchers, it could require the production of as many as 45 engines a year. With the moderate rate of four launches a year, 12 engines would be required annually. Due to such high numbers of required engines and the need to produce same hardware for the American Atlas rocket, it looked possible that an additional manufacturer based in the city of Perm would be brought into the project. The same company was responsible for mass production of RD-191 engine for the Angara rocket.
The second stage of the vehicle had to be powered either by kerosene or hydrogen according to the Technical Assignment of the Russian space agency. The head of the Russian space agency, Roskosmos, Anatoly Perminov told Russian press that hydrogen would be used on the second stage.
According to unofficial reports, a formal opening of envelopes with industry proposals on the new rocket would take place on March 16, 2009. The commission was then expected to make a decision on March 19. Chulkov said that Roskosmos would have 10 days to complete the formal review of all proposals and the agency would pick a winner by March 25, 2009. The key consideration would be cost-effectiveness of the proposal, Chulkov said. The decision would be followed by the preliminary development of the project, which was expected to last for around one year.
more > russianspaceweb.com
Blue Oceans Uses Iridium for Remote Monitoring of Explosive Magazines
Blue Oceans Satellite Systems Inc. announced its newest application for asset tracking and remote monitoring with the addition of its Explosives Regulatory Division (ERD)-Compliant Satellite-Based Explosive Magazine Monitoring Solution (EMMS). The solution, based on the system requirements of the federal government of Canada’s Explosives Magazine Security Surveillance Program, represents the latest step in the company’s remote monitoring capabilities. The EMMS utilizes the Iridium satellite network – the largest commercial satellite constellation in the world, delivering global coverage to offer the only certified two-way access control to remote explosive magazines.
Employing the bi-directional Iridium data service allows Blue Oceans’ customers to implement on-demand remote queries of systems and immediate over-the-air system updates, such as the acces entry changes. It also allows for the remote diagnosis of problems, which virtually eliminates the need to dispatch service personnel. Additionally, the base product is easily expandable, allowing two explosive magazines to be monitored from one unit. Customers find these cost-effective benefits particularly valuable.
Blue Oceans is cooperating with Value-Added Resellers (VARs) across Canada to offer customers local installation and purchasing entities. This alliance will allow local distribution and superior installation, maintenance and monitoring services to customers everywhere in Canada.
Employing the bi-directional Iridium data service allows Blue Oceans’ customers to implement on-demand remote queries of systems and immediate over-the-air system updates, such as the acces entry changes. It also allows for the remote diagnosis of problems, which virtually eliminates the need to dispatch service personnel. Additionally, the base product is easily expandable, allowing two explosive magazines to be monitored from one unit. Customers find these cost-effective benefits particularly valuable.
Blue Oceans is cooperating with Value-Added Resellers (VARs) across Canada to offer customers local installation and purchasing entities. This alliance will allow local distribution and superior installation, maintenance and monitoring services to customers everywhere in Canada.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)